首页 > qq > 正文

倚天屠龙记马景涛版

PLA Southern Theater Command tracks, monitors and warns 3 Philippine aircraft after their illegal entry into Huangyan Dao airspace_我的网站

玉观音

A |     北京时间8月11日,近日,前勇士球员埃利斯的一番言论引起热议。他表示,如果他和库里互换,预计勇士也能达到同样的高度。前NBA球星蒂格在播客上谈到了这件事,他不认同埃利斯的说法,但他给出的言论,同样颇具争议。    

An aerial drone photo taken on May 2, 2026 shows reefs in the territorial waters of China's Huangyan Dao in the South China Sea. (Xinhua/Chen Bin)
    An aerial drone photo taken on May 2, 2026 shows reefs in the territorial waters of China's Huangyan Dao in the South China Sea. (Xinhua/Chen Bin)The PLA Southern Theater Command said on Friday that three Philippine aircraft illegally entered China's territorial airspace over Huangyan Dao without approval, prompting Chinese naval and air forces to track, monitor and issue verbal warnings to the aircraft.
On Friday, three small Philippine aircraft - an Islander, a C-208, and a PA-31T - illegally intruded into China's territorial airspace over Huangyan Dao without approval from the Chinese government. The naval and air forces dispatched by the PLA Southern Theater Command (STC) tracked and monitored the Philippine aircraft, and issued verbal warnings to them in accordance with laws and regulations, senior Colonel Li Jianjian, spokesperson for the PLA STC Air Force, said in a statement on Friday. 
The acts of the Philippine side seriously violate China's sovereignty, and are highly likely to cause misunderstanding and miscalculation. "We sternly warn the Philippine side to stop rights-violation and provocative acts immediately. Forces of the STC remain on high alert at all times to firmly safeguard national sovereignty and security as well as regional peace and stability," said the spokesperson. 
Ding Duo, director of the Research Center for International and Regional Issues at the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, called the Philippines' latest move another "stunt."
The Philippines previously submitted its so-called "territorial sea baselines" around Huangyan Dao, so it is not unexpected that Manila would follow up with actions at sea or in the air to stir up tensions, keep the issue in the spotlight and stage further provocations, said Ding.
At present, the Philippines can barely gain access to the relevant waters and has secured no tangible advantage there. Aircraft, however, can enter and leave the area quickly. Such operations not only provide material for media hype but also generate footage of China's response, allowing Manila to project resolve and reassure its military and law-enforcement forces at home, Ding told the Global Times. 
In late July, the Philippines notified the United Nations of the so-called "baselines and maritime zones" surrounding Huangyan Dao. On July 31, the Chinese Foreign Ministry issued a statement on the Philippines' delimitation of the so-called "baselines of the territorial sea" around Huangyan Dao, calling the move "a grave infringement upon China's territorial sovereignty and a serious violation of international law."
"It is illegal, null and void. China firmly rejects and will never accept it," the statement said.
Meanwhile, Manila appears emboldened by growing security and defense cooperation with the US and Japan. Backed by these external partners, the Philippines has shown greater willingness to stage provocations, while its military and law-enforcement forces have displayed increasingly risk-prone and opportunistic behavior, said Ding.
China has exercised considerable restraint over the Huangyan Dao, but the Philippines should not mistake that restraint for weakness. If China were to employ the full range of available measures, Philippine aircraft would likewise be denied access to the area, said Ding.
By dispatching small aircraft for deliberate provocations, the Philippines is further increasing the risk of miscalculation. Such aerial incursions are highly unpredictable and carry serious escalation risks. If China responds with resolute or more forceful measures to defend its rights and an unintended incident occurs as a result, the Philippines should bear full responsibility for the consequences, the expert warned. 
。         “利拉德从来没有比库里更强……但如果把库里从这支队伍拿掉,换上利拉德,我会觉得可以。”蒂格说道,“我认为他们大概率能取得差不多的战绩,很有可能拿到一样的结果。”          多年来,球迷常常将库里和利拉德放在一起比较。两人都擅长在半场任意位置干拔出手,并且命中率高得惊人,但二者的相似之处基本仅此而已。库里更加出色的无球跑动、控球、传球以及投篮稳定性,让他走出了一条和巅峰效力开拓者时期的利拉德截然不同的职业道路。勇士与开拓者曾多次在季后赛交手,最近一次是2019年西部决赛,勇士在缺少杜兰特的情况下,依旧横扫开拓者晋级。

B |          利拉德的生涯足够辉煌,未来必将入选名人堂,完全没有什么可遗憾的。不过篮球圈内大多数人恐怕很难认同蒂格的这番言论。

C |          有美媒分析如下——          “2014-15赛季,库里的竞技水准比利拉德高出一个档次。倘若换成利拉德,勇士实力会大幅下滑,很难相信他们依旧能够拿下总冠军。假如勇士在2016-17、2017-18赛季直接用库里单换利拉德,他们或许能够拿下其中一座甚至两座总冠军。至于2022年那座冠军,声称换成其他人也能带领这支勇士登顶,本身就是一种轻视。那支球队进攻存在明显短板,正是库里依靠炉火纯青的有球、无球结合能力,弥补了全队的进攻缺陷。”          “总结来说:倘若利拉德和库里互换生涯,他或许能跟随勇士拿到一两座总冠军。但断言他可以拿下四座冠军,则完全忽视了库里在每一支冠军队伍里起到的核心作用。”          大家有什么看法?欢迎留言发表见解。

Current article:http://6n7sxd.yofateeikengyeche.cfd/pgnhn/20260826/53009.html

Published on:18:58:19